聚焦1925年雪橇手和雪橇犬齐心协力为拯救阿拉斯加州诺姆市孩子的性命而奔波于血清接力路上的事件，被称为“Great Race of Mercy”。　　1924年年底，诺姆市一个2岁小孩生病，医生诊断其患有扁桃体炎，这种疾病通常不会有生命危险，然而这个小孩成为例外，接下来很多孩子都被诊断患上了扁桃体炎，有几个不幸离世，医生最终确认这种病症是白喉。当时有一种疫苗能够用来对付白喉，然后诺姆市的疫苗全部过期，新疫苗在港口关闭前却未能送达，来年6月波罗的海才会解冻，也没有公路直通诺姆市、没有飞机，唯一运输货物的通道是邮路，然而冬天只有雪橇犬能够通行。卫生局决定使用两组雪橇犬接力运输，20个雪橇手和150只雪橇犬必须日夜兼程，经过河流，跨过平原，穿过森林，穿越冰冻的阿拉斯加邮路。最近的疫苗所在地为南纳，距离诺姆市1085公里，一般情况下狗拉雪橇需要费时25日，而他们只花了5天半就成功完成接力，拯救了多名孩子的性命。　　本片主角Togo是挪威赶雪橇高手Leonhard Seppala（威廉·达福 饰）使用的其中一只领头犬，因机智、卓越的领导力和敏锐的直觉备受称赞。Seppala被委任传送这场接力中最危险的一段，从诺姆到奴拉托接收那批免疫血清，在零下30度、七级以上强风的环境下成功完成了任务。之后南极探险家Roald Amundsen为Togo颁发了一枚金牌。　　比约恩饰演一名接力人员，在途中背叛了Seppala。

　　故事发生在位于意大利那不勒斯的一个贫穷而又破败的社区之中，莉拉（卢多维卡·纳斯蒂 Ludovica Nasti 饰）和爱莲娜（艾丽莎·德尔·杰尼奥 Elisa del Genio 饰）从小就生活在那里。莉拉出生在一个专制的家庭之中，父亲是一名鞋匠。虽然莉拉在班级里是公认的天才少女，但是在父亲的坚持之下，莉拉最终放弃了学业，在鞋店里成为了帮工。　　和莉拉不同，爱莲娜在家人和老师的支持之下继续求学，虽然和莉拉走上了截然不同的人生道路，但爱莲娜的目光始终凝聚在莉拉的身上。在十六岁那一年，莉拉嫁给了苦苦追求她的富家子弟斯代凡诺（乔万尼·阿穆拉 Giovanni Amura 饰），可是等待着她的却并非美好的婚姻生活。

《剧场版进击的巨人前编红莲的弓矢》是由荒木哲郎执导，梶裕贵、石川由依主演的一部影片。

　　当10个年轻人去探索一家废弃的比萨店时，他们很快就知道，他们将不得不为自己的生命而战，同时试图揭开比萨店令人不安的历史。

　　这是一个关于亲情与爱情的故事。雪（黄翠如 饰）与恋人威（王凯 饰）买下一只可爱的小狗Snowy，两人在照顾Snowy过程中感情也日益更坚固。不料威因工作表现出色，被调到北京三年才能返港。但雪不愿放弃乐团前往东京等地演唱的机会，拒绝与威同往北京。两人陷入感情僵局。与威分离后，雪与Snowy相依为命，开始感怀身世——雪幼年因父母离异而记恨母亲（黄淑仪 饰），不理会母亲多次示好，两人关系持续交恶。感怀之下，雪萌生了为小狗找回亲生母亲的念头，但几经尝试却以失败告终。期间却因为Snowy的帮助，让雪与母亲有了冰释前嫌的机会……

　　乡村的古惑仔，乡村的江湖，和香港的江湖一样，也是红颜祸水、恩怨械斗。 正所谓，有人的地方，就有江湖。　　村里有人，我家的小村，也就是一个完整的江湖。 我——陈杰、妹妹——陈芳、小弟——大牛(刘坤)、红颜——彭小丽、死敌——江帆。原 因很简单，我们都喜欢彭小丽，那么就用古惑仔的办法来决定小丽的归宿吧。

　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　一桩有预谋的杀人案令三流律师“大嘴巴”朴昌浩（李钟硕 饰）一夜之间成为天才诈骗犯“大老鼠”，被诬陷进入狱黑化成为监狱大佬，以恶制恶同黑暗势力对抗。妻子高薇瑚（林允儿 饰）为拯救丈夫，同他里应外合共同查案，夫妻二人誓要揭出幕后黑手。

　　索菲亚·科波拉将执导新片《触礁》(On the Rocks)，比尔·莫瑞、拉什达·琼斯主演，这将是苹果和A24合作的第一部电影，下月开拍。　　剧本由科波拉编写，讲述一个年轻妈妈和她有英雄色彩的父亲重新联系，在纽约展开一段冒险。

　　刑侦大队队长程兵（张译 饰）带领的三大队在办理一起恶性案件的过程中导致嫌犯之一意外死亡，被判入狱。出狱后依然坚持以普通人身份追踪在逃嫌犯。　　影片根据真实事件改编，原载于“网易人间工作室”作者深蓝的《请转告局长，三大队任务完成了》。

　　为了逮捕涉及4万亿韩元、造成3万名受害者的稀世大骗子，诈骗犯（玄彬饰）和检察官展开较量的诈骗犯罪。玄彬将在片中饰演设下完美骗局的诈骗犯黄智成，是一位专挑诈骗犯行骗的天才诈骗犯；刘智泰在片中饰演劣性检察官朴熙洙，为抓住稀世大骗子而制定计划招揽黄智成，表面正义内里却是对权力有无尽欲望的人。电影新颖、烧脑的故事令人耳目一新，而两位演技派演员的互相飙戏也引发众多期待。电影计划于2016年下半年拍摄。

　　两个孩子半夜醒来，发现他们的父亲不见了，家里所有的门窗都消失了……